A blog devoted to law, politics, philosophy, & life. Nothing in this blog is to be construed as legal advice.

Tuesday, April 13, 2004

Feeney Amendment and ex post facto laws

Ruling it is "procedural rather than substantive," the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has joined other circuits in applying the PROTECT Act's de novo review of federal sentences to appeals that were pending when the act was passed.
(Free registration required).

Pre-Feeney, a judge's decision to grant a downward departure was subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review. (Koon v. United States). The Feeney Amendment provided that sentencing decisions would not be subject to de novo review. The Feeney Amendment applied retroactively.

The legal issue is fascinating. We know that a change in a rule of evidence that makes it easier for the prosecution to prove a defendant's guilt violates the ex post facto clause. It seems to me that a procedural rule that makes a harsher sentence more likely also violates the ex post facto clause.
Half a cup of justice

County Attorney Barbara LaWall hired James Stuehringer to represent Peasley as he fought disbarment for allowing former Tucson Police Department Officer Joseph Godoy to lie on the stand in two capital murder trials.

If these charges are true, then a prosecution must follow.