Inglewood Police Officer indicted on federal charges
I think this violates Double Jeopardy. And yeah, I know the theory and cases behind allowing a successive federal court prosecution.
A blog devoted to law, politics, philosophy, & life. Nothing in this blog is to be construed as legal advice.
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(138)
- ► 05/02 - 05/09 (1)
- ► 04/18 - 04/25 (2)
- ► 04/11 - 04/18 (2)
- ► 04/04 - 04/11 (4)
- ► 03/28 - 04/04 (8)
- ► 03/21 - 03/28 (6)
- ► 03/14 - 03/21 (5)
- ► 02/29 - 03/07 (7)
- ► 02/22 - 02/29 (7)
- ► 02/15 - 02/22 (22)
-
▼
02/08 - 02/15
(21)
- Maybe there is a reason the parents don't want you...
- The Sixth Amendment means free representation... ...
- More proof that it's the lawyer that counts Crimi...
- Pre-law? File a lawsuit! "Three white applicants...
- The law of marriage in California California Fami...
- Above the law "In an open challenge to California...
- Criminal Law & the Supreme Court, an Update For y...
- How can I not support Bush's amnesty plan? "The M...
- McNab v. United States A superb discussion of the...
- Wesley Clark drops out of campaign. Breaking news...
- Howard "How Appealing" Bashman on becoming an appe...
- I was irony my BDU's today Here is someone else c...
- What would Patton do? Peter Kirsanow, a member of...
- Pepperdine Professors Kmiec and Scarberry on impea...
- Big award in civil rights case. "LONGMONT, Colo. ...
- Who says growing old doesn't have advantages? New...
- Federal Judicial Center - FREE Books The Federal ...
- Inglewood Police Officer indicted on federal charg...
- Famous Trials website Please check out the Famous...
- Judicial economy and persuasion Ernie the Attorne...
- Eugene Volokh on the Feeney Amendment Eugene Volo...
- ► 02/01 - 02/08 (17)
- ► 01/25 - 02/01 (23)
- ► 01/18 - 01/25 (5)
- ► 01/11 - 01/18 (1)
- ► 01/04 - 01/11 (7)
-
►
2003
(14)
- ► 12/28 - 01/04 (6)
- ► 12/21 - 12/28 (8)